Rigid. Legalistic. Strict. Hardcore. Shunning. Members Only. Elitist.

These are words I have heard used to describe the Pentecostal/Charismatic movement, of which I was apart of for 15 years, and I fervently rejected those labels as false while there. We weren’t rigid, we were Holy. We aren’t legalistic, we are keeping ourselves from sin. We didn’t shun people, outsiders, ex-members, backsliders – we avoided the influence of Satan to the saving of our families!

Of course, we had the only saving message, no one else spoke in tongues like we did, or dressed holy, or rejected the orthodox trinity, rolled on the floor, jerked and spasmed in worship, were ‘slain in the Spirit’, etc. We were the True Church, the Body of Christ. Others may have been sincere, but sincerely wrong and most importantly, lost. When Jesus came again for his Bride, we knew we were the only ones who were the ‘Five wise virgins.’ When others prayed, we called it ‘insincere’ or ‘so fake’. Christians that wore crosses were ‘following a false god’. Any preacher that sits on a stool in jeans and talks to his flock is a ‘hireling’ creating ‘two fold children of hell’. At least, that is what our preacher taught us.

Watch the video version of this article here.

My story began in 2002 when a charismatic sales manager at the company I worked for, who always seemed to have it all together (and I didn’t!) started talking to me about the Bible, lifestyle, growth, etc. (Isn’t that how all these cultist stories start?) I grew up slipping in and out of Sunday School as we moved every six months, but I still carried an old Bible around from my childhood and God wasn’t strange to me, but organized religious thought was. Soon this turned to Bible studies, promises that God would increase my income, my health, find me the ‘right’ girl, etc. Through coaching things started getting better, I dressed better, moved up in the job, made more money and eventually got involved in the Church. I even found the ‘right’ girl, and we have been married for nearly 11 years and have a beautiful family.

Like every ‘first timer’ I thought these Pentecostals were crazy. They were, and I was! Through time I ‘came in’ to the Church as they call it, which simply means I bought in to the message, got baptized, became an adherent. The fruits of the Spirit started showing up in my life, which to them means I conformed to the rules, threw out my TV, threw out my short sleeve t-shirts, never let any hair show on my face, etc. The indoctrination is slow, in baby steps, but the realities of the ‘requirements’ didn’t take long to sink in. I need to say that the church I attended was an independent (red flag word) church not affiliated to the more commonly known UPCI (United Pentecostal Church International) organization. When the UPCI started allowing wedding rings and television, the hard core fundamentalists broke away.

Just a few of those requirements…

  • No Television/Movies of any sort – Satan was in every show.
  • Strict dress standards, no short sleeve shirts, shorts, etc. women must wear dresses/skirts (Pants are mens apparel), no metal objects can be used in the hair, or metal tie clips, etc. A man must have very short hair, it can’t touch the ears…no facial hair is allowed, etc.
  • Controlled courting/dating, by the Pastor’s approval only (He alone has divine wisdom to know who is right for you)
  • Control of what you think, read, listen to or see
  • Control of who you can fellowship with, no outsiders should be ‘friends’

The list of requirements to maintain ‘holiness’ is far too long to list in a blog article, but suffice it to say they can be suffocating. In Toxic Faith, written by Stephen Arterburn, he says;

Conformity is paramount. So little room for individuality exists that the kids rebel by the droves. When they do, they are considered outcasts and of little importance compared to the few who are willing to stay inside the system, follow the rules and reproduce the addiction structure.

It took many years of spiritual discomfort before I had the courage to step out. Your entire social circle is based in the church. (Toxic Faith Characteristic #3, “Us vs. Them Mentality”) Your family that are strict believers will push you away (to be fair, when you do leave, you also tend to pull away from them), your friends that would invite you out to lunch suddenly can’t text you any longer, or find the time for a meal. Inside the church, we are taught to stay away from those who leave the Church, especially if they leave on bad terms. Of course, bad terms simply means they no longer obeyed the every command of the pastor. I know of a young family who simply moved to another town (Moving requires the pastors permission too) and since he didn’t wait for the pastors approval, only two people in the church will still talk to them. They are in rebellion and likely will be ‘lost’.

In my departing letter to the pastor, I wrote two lines that I go back and read again to affirm the reality that I was in a Toxic Faith church, and as such, had to leave immediately! If you read this blog post and think, “I’m going through that too..” regardless of the denomination, leave right now!

“This has taken years to gain the courage to do so, which proves the absolute necessity to do so.”

“It has taken me a long time to wrestle with the reality that I was in, and sinfully promoting an abusive, controlling and non-Christ focused Church, though Christ is mentioned as reason for obedience to a man.”

How was I sinfully promoting the church?

“…for whatsoever is not of faith is sin.” Romans 14:23

I had no faith in what I was doing. I was obligated, I feared ‘getting in trouble’, I did what I did to maintain status quo and to tow the company line. In a legalistic church you don’t question authority. In my church the Pastor was the absolute rule, he had no oversight. The so called ‘board’ was all hand-picked followers. If you questioned the Pastor you were in rebellion. If you asked to work in certain areas of ministry, you were scolded. Only he can choose what, if and when you are capable of serving God. If you felt called to Preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ, it was only if ‘he’ said you could. The ‘he’ wasn’t God either. Today, celebrating 41 years in this small town, our church hasn’t produced a single preacher, missionary, evangelist, etc. Kings don’t like other Kings.

Not all Pentecostal Churches are the same, like any other denomination they have good and bad apples. Likewise, not everything in ‘my’ church was bad! I gained a lot of insight, I graduated from a three year Bible College with a 4.0 GPA, I met my wife and will cherish her the rest of my life! Without this step in my journey of faith, those things wouldn’t have happened and thus I cannot say this was a mistake. What I can say, is that staying as long as I did was the mistake.

In a short counseling session afterwards (yes, you’ll need counseling after 15 years in an abusive church, don’t be ashamed of it) I was explaining my fears and the counselor said, “You keep saying I’ll lose everything. With everything you are explaining, and as bad as it is, what are you really losing?”

You know what – that question was important in my healing process which is still on going. My entire mindset was that ‘being an outsider’ was evil, wicked, fearful and even shameful. I had to come to grips that ‘being an outsider’ meant I was leaving behind the spiritual abuse and all the trappings that came with it! How many times do we hear of a domestic abuse victim staying for fear of losing the only ‘love’ they have? It is very much the same brethren and you must get out. Abuse is often tendered with, and tolerated out of love.

In the book The Subtle Power of Spiritual Abuse written by David Johnson and Jeff Van Vonderen, chapter six is titled ‘When you can not leave’ and some of the words are so applicable I must write them here.

In a place where authority is grasped or legislated, not simply demonstrated, persecution sensitivity builds a case for keeping everything within the system. Why? Because of the evil, dangerous or unspiritual people outside of the system who are trying to weaken or destroy “us”.

We have counseled many Christians who after deciding to leave their church, we were told horrifying things. “God is going to withdraw His Spirit from you and your family.” “God will destroy your business.” “Without our protection, Satan will get your children.” “You and your family will come under a curse!”

This is spiritual blackmail and it’s abuse. And it does cause people to stay in abusive places.

This is the very heart of the reason I had to leave and why you, if you are nodding your head reading this must also leave your toxic church! There are more loving places that will accept you and lead you to the real Christ. Leaving is difficult to say the least. If you are married and your spouse is still ‘buying’ the message, there will be some divide. I urge you to never use this against your marriage! In all things stay faithful, true, honest, open, loving and understanding.

That spouse will see you as the ‘outsider trying to pull them out’, and you will probably try to pull them out! However, let the real demonstration of spiritual authority, which is following Christ, not legislating others be the guide that brings them out. Jesus sent his disciples into the world to ‘show’ them who was that Light, not legalize them and make them follow Him.

Now, and finally, I do not want to be labeled as ‘one who causes division among the brethren’, but I want you to honestly search your heart, your church, your religion and your relationship to God. Ask yourself, “Am I following God in my heart, through Faith in Jesus, knowing His Word and seeking His Will, or am I following a structure, an organization and a set of rules or an absolute ruler that makes me feel holy and acceptable to Him by rigid compliance with threat of loss?”

In an article, The 10 Signs of Spiritual Abuse I found a mirror for what my church was, and it’s leadership. If you and your church identifies with these, make preparations to move. Find a loving Church that teaches simply what the Bible says. Meditate on Mark 7:7 before reading this list and comparing it to your church.

“Their worship of me is worthless, because they teach human rules as doctrines.” Amplified Bible

  • Personality Centric
    • Charismatic, Strong, Intelligent. Holds complete sway and power over the congregants and his/her authority cannot be questioned.
  • Operates Independently
    • No oversight, no governing body. The pastor of the local assembly answers to no one.
  • Engulfment (Isolation)
    • Members only, outsiders are only ‘loved’ if they ‘come in’ or are in the ‘process of coming in’. Otherwise they are heathens.
  • Busyness
    • Keep members so enslaved to the ‘work’ of the church, you can ‘never give enough’, spirituality is questions if members become tired and request a reprieve.
  • Stalking
    • Keeping tabs on members, checking their prayer times, givings, what they are reading, listening to, watching, hanging out with. This often involves cannibalization whereby members spy on and turn in other members when ‘bad behavior’ is spotted. Cult?
  • Coded Language
    • Members only jargon. If your preacher ever says, ‘Stop the recording’, you had a giant red flag waving in front of you.
  • Unrealistic Promises
    • God will give you a pay raise, ‘If’…
  • Courting Rituals
    • Pastor controls when, if and who you can date, who you can marry, how long you should date and when you can marry. Notice that ‘Should’ is never the case, and in these churches, choosing to date who you wish without permission is instantly labeled as ‘immoral’.
  • Shunning
    • In our church, any members who leave are not to be fellow-shipped. They are disfellowshipped. They taught ‘wave nice when you see them in the store, but don’t be spending time with them…’
  • The Ends Justify the Means
    • The above 9 stands are justified if it means ‘we make it to heaven.’ which is equated to following the rules of the church.

Let me end this with saying that this should not be used to attack people of the Pentecostal faith! They are just as sincere as those they mock. They are loyal (mostly) and are seeking God like most Christians do. The ‘abuse’ comes from the top of a Church. Even the Pastors may not be guilty of willfully abusing the flock. They are carrying a torch that started long before they took the reins. It only takes a cursory glance through the Bible, from Acts to Jude to realize that ‘legalism’, or obedience to a ruleset was rejected by Christ and his Disciples, yet authority requires obedience when authority is placed in a mans hands.

Rather, use this article is a dipping stick to see if your heart tells you that you may be in a legalistic church. My story is simply one of hundreds, thousands and perhaps millions. The Charismatic/Pentecostal movement is one of the fastest growing denominations right now because it is intense, loud, charismatic and exuberant. Many stay for the spirituality – some stay out of fear. If you fall into the latter case, examine whether the spirit of your church be ‘of God’. Pray, seek Him, seek guidance from outsiders and ask questions, with a right spirit. Most of all, follow Christ!

God Bless,




Posted by dividinghisword

I am the father of two, husband of one, and lover of Christ! I simply seek to spread the Word of God unadulterated, not filtered by denominational interpretation. I have a degree in Theology from Texas Bible College but more so I have His Word!


  1. Found your page recently and am findinf myself in your words. Thanks for providing this resource.



  2. God bless you For your article I attended a UPC church for only a month and began to fall into legalism, and began to question are all these rules based off faith or man made religion? In fact, Jesus was never part of denominations so why do we have them? I left and I finally feel free



  3. “No Television/Movies of any sort – Satan was in every show.”

    That’s what I’ve been going through since I hit my head on a doorframe in my house seven (going on eight) years ago. After that point, I could not enjoy anything without hearing a voice in my head (possibly that of Ralph Sexton, Jr., a TV preacher from Asheville, NC my mother listens to) yelling “Immoral!”.

    The reason why I say this is before that moment happened, my television choices were generally of the more classic shows of the past, and very little of the 90s and 2000s stuff (although I have liked one 90s series, that being Star Trek: Voyager [w/Kate Mulgrew as Capt. Kathryn Janeway]). After I hit my head, however, from that point forward, every single thing I even tried to enjoy (no matter how old, or how little/much sex/violence, B/W or color) triggered that voice in my head. I mean, I couldn’t even enjoy the 60s classic called The Fugitive (w/the late David Janssen) w/o hearing that voice. This led me to believe (perhaps wrongly) that not only was the 90s and 2000s stuff I was avoiding the sin, but that the medium in and of itself was the sin ever since it started (which is how I’m interpreting what you said about that UPCI rule).

    Over time, however, the voice quieted down and started to not be as bothersome, and I started to enjoy a few shows; I’ve even gotten into a few Westerns, which is a genre that before I wouldn’t touch with a 10-ft. pole (those Westerns have included Have Gun, Will Travel, Wanted: Dead or Alive, and even The Rebel [which I’ve most recently started on]).

    Liked by 1 person


    1. That’s really too bad because my experience was just the opposite. When I came into Pentecost, our church didn’t preach against television. When I received the Holy Ghost, nobody preached against worldly music, television or sports. I wasn’t conditioned in any way to oppose such things. I was simply a teenager in love with the Lord. However, upon receiving the Holy Ghost, I felt dirty when I listened to worldly music, and I felt dirty when I watched television. So, without instructions from the pulpit, I simply quit doing those things. My family would watch TV while I stayed in my room and studied my Bible and listened to gospel music.

      What a glorious day it was when the rest of my family was baptized in Jesus’ name and filled with the Holy Ghost! Again, without guidance from the pulpit, my parents got convicted over television and worldly music. They threw those things out of our house, and what a relief it was! That was a very long time ago. My family is still in church and we haven’t missed TV or the world’s music. Thank God for setting us free from that bondage!



  4. Leaving an extremely strict Holiness Pentecostal church after almost 20 years has been so hard for me and my husband (he was raised in it and was a preacher). We just seemed to wake up one day (like Saul on the road to Damascus) and say, “Why are we ok with new people in the church being run off when they don’t conform to our outward standards?”, Or “Why am I ok with being scared to death that my dress may he 1/2″ too short and my husband’s ministry will be ruined?” Everything from females in dress,no TV, no facial hair on men, uncut hair on females, no jewelry, no makeup, was a requirement for salvation. There are many other requirements according to this religion and now that we have left, I see such hypocrisy. And we were part of it, even preached it! It has been hard with some family members judging us and thinking we have backslid. And the “judgemental” attitude you are bred to have has been so hard to get over. I believe a woman and man should be outwardly modest, but pants will not send a woman to hell. Our hearts will be what’s judged. Praying God will lead us as we try to break away from this legalistic thinking that has been ingrained in us for so many years.

    Liked by 1 person


  5. Hi Ralph,

    I have thought about this, and read a lot of your posts, and even seen close friends of mine leaving what they perceive as legalism in Apostolic churches. What has concerned me most, is this idea and seeming reality that those who leave legalism end up swinging far to the other side of the pendulum. I had tried to verbalize this myself several times in conversations with those close to me, because whether I am still a part of a UPCI ministry or not, I do see the other side and sympathize. I was hurt in another UPCI church, where I poured myself out in ministry for years, only to encounter a whole new world of pastoral overreach and spiritual abuse when I tried to leave and return to my current (and original) church. That pastor even tried to sabotage my ministry when I came back to my home church… thankfully the weapons formed against me did not prosper; I stayed submitted to the Lord and stayed humble and things have worked out. The Lord brought us through it and while there are some emotional wounds that have had to heal over the past year, we are doing well and happy where we are.

    So anyway, what I have seen happen to my close friends who have left the Oneness Apostolic faith, is they just don’t seem concerned about God anymore. They don’t talk about Him. I am not the judge of their souls, but I’m also not blind, and it seems that they only care about current events, or video games, or sports, or whatever they are into (and I’m not bashing any of those things, I enjoy them too). And some went off to start churches where they teach that tattoos and piercings are OK, for example, with a complete disregard for any moral standards and principles put forth in the Bible. That seems like just another error to me.

    In Ezekiel 36:36-27, God says ” will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh. 27 And I will put my Spirit in you and move you to follow my decrees and be careful to keep my laws.” I have always taken this to be an example / prophecy concerning the Holy Spirit that would be given to believers in the new covenant (although I do see from the context that this was given specifically to Israel, take it as you will). So is God’s plan really to have the Law just go away altogether? I would think not, but rather that the intention is for us to obey the principles that are revealed in the Law from the HEART rather than from fear.

    My main way of thinking now, is not that UPCI holiness standards are inherently bad. Some of them, I think, are good and respectable! (and others of course outdated / incorrect). The problem is that we put the cart before the horse. We try to modify behavior before letting God work on the individual’s heart. We think that a person is saved by “holiness” (which we somehow translate to our very specific standards), rather than allowing genuine faith to develop and provoke good works. I see this clearly as legalism, but it doesn’t discredit that many of the standards are a good thing to do, IF they are done from a willing heart out of LOVE and not fear.

    The challenge is that upon leaving legalism, it seems that many people fall into “antinomianism”, or the idea that we are not subject to any moral law and that God does not expect us to fulfill morality.

    I have tried to form the words to verbalize this, and I came across this article from R.C. Sproul (I believe) that deals with legalism VS antinomianism: https://www.ligonier.org/blog/one-genuine-cure-legalism-and-antinomianism/ that you may (or may not) find interesting.

    God Bless, thanks for reading. Let’s keep seeking truth first!



    1. I agree with your post and glad to have read it. I myself have noticed people leaving strict legalistic churches and gone over to the other side of the road, into the ditch actually. It’s a shame they appear to have thrown everything out the window.



    2. Interesting post. I would say in reply, however, that the principles you describe apply to every commandment, not just “standards” (Ro. 6:17). Whatever is not of faith is sin (Ro. 14:23), so everything we do must be unto the Lord from our hearts by faith.

      That said, I think you have fallen into the same trap as antinomians with respect to your version of “legalism.” Children are made to obey the “standards” their parents establish whether or not they understand them and whether or not they agree with them. Many standards are common in every household and many of them, perhaps, are not. Whether you like making your bed, brushing your teeth three times a day, taking out the garbage, dressing up when you go to town or mowing the lawn every Friday night, you’ll have to do those things if your parents want you to. That’s not legalism; that’s good parenting. Ditto for a Christian church. There are lots of things that we may not initially understand, but that doesn’t mean we’re free to ignore them.

      Good ministers have the authority to command, rebuke and enforce both explicit biblical standards and arbitrary ones in the same manner as parents. As with parents, they should exercise care that they do not become lords of God’s heritage or become so onerous that they end up discouraging people from living for God. A good minister will lead people into a closer relationship with the Lord, even though he’s considered a “legalist” by antinomians.



    3. Hello,

      Thank you for the comments on here, it is encouraging to see respectful dialogue. I too have written about this pendulum swing with those existing extreme legalism or high control systems/churches. I call it the Rubber Band Effect.

      For instance, a rubber band, when stretched to the extent its elasticity, it either breaks and conforms to the pressures upon it, or it overcomes the pressures and shoots away with incredible velocity and force. The problem with some of these comments, such as “It’s too bad they go too far”, is that they place all of the responsibility on the rubber band and fail to acknowledge that thing which is exercising force upon the rubber band that causes it to break or fly away.

      I too have seen and spoken to hundreds who had left faith all together, or are left so damaged they can’t find faith or are so untrusting now that to them, placing their spiritual well being into the hands of another ‘pastor’ is just too scary to accept.

      Furthermore, Scalia commented that pastors have the authority to create extra-biblical or ‘arbitrary’ standards. That is an incredibly frightful stance to take, perhaps as frightening as saying pastors have no value or are unnecessary, for it at once sets the stage for the abuse that pulls the rubberband to breaking points, but it outright flys against Scriptural commands of adding to or taking away from God’s holy commands. Take Mark 7 as a basis of example. In verse 7, Jesus said, “In vain you worship me, teaching mans commandments (standards) as if they were doctrines.”

      Matthew 23 deals with the self same issues and in thr Seven Woes of the Pharisees we see open condemnation by our Lord for this behavior. The pharisees were explicitly guilty of creating arbitrary standards and then causing people to be obedient to their ‘authority’ by convincing them that obedience to those standards was the same as obedience to God’s commandments.

      As a matter of fact, the UPC/Oneness system does precisely this. They call them Holiness Standards, and while some may be so bold as to say, “These standards are not salvific”, they are unfortunately and perhaps for some of them, unknowingly speaking lies. How? Because each and every attempt to teach these standards is accompanied with the reference, “Without Holiness no man shall see the Lord.” And while that Scripture is true, the falsity is that it has nothing to do with ‘arbitrary’ standards, but it also reinforces the teaching that if you don’t comply to said arbitrary standards, you will not see the Lord. Thus by proxy, they have specifically made ‘arbitrary’ standards equal to the Commands of God. And thus, fulfill Mark 7:7.

      No pastor has authority to create arbitrary standards. That very sentence should set off bells, whistles and red flags to any Bible studying individual, for that is what every cultic organization has convinced it’s peope of, that Pastors are the vicar of Christ and have Apostolic authority to lay the bed rock (doctrines, commandments) of the Church, and they, pastors, in fact, do not.

      Ezekiel 34 is a fantastic example of what false shepherd’s are, and why contrast, what a true shepherd should be.

      All of that is to say, we need Gods commandments and His Holy Word and Spirit, not Man’s Commandments.



      1. dividinghisword states:

        Furthermore, Scalia commented that pastors have the authority to create extra-biblical or ‘arbitrary’ standards. That is an incredibly frightful stance to take, perhaps as frightening as saying pastors have no value or are unnecessary, for it at once sets the stage for the abuse that pulls the rubberband to breaking points, but it outright flys against Scriptural commands of adding to or taking away from God’s holy commands. Take Mark 7 as a basis of example. In verse 7, Jesus said, “In vain you worship me, teaching mans commandments (standards) as if they were doctrines.”

        If you’re going to reply to an argument of mine, even indirectly, you should address the entire argument. Your counter fails to address my argument and fails to engage the underlying scriptural reasons behind the argument. You should know those reasons since you were in Pentecost as long as you say you were.

        First, the Bible commands children to obey their parents. Nowhere in the Bible are children told to brush their teeth, make their beds, wash the dishes, mow the lawn, dress up when they go to town, or say, “Yes, sir” (or ma’am) when addressing adults. All of these commands are arbitrary yet they are within the scope of the legitimate exercise of parental authority. If the Smiths have a 10:00 p.m. curfew for their teenage children, their children are required on the authority of Scripture to obey their parents even though there’s nothing in the Bible about a 10:00 cufew. And the same Bible which commands children to obey their parents commands the saints to obey the ministry. A pastor has the authority to establish the times of general assembly, how many services to have in a week, what dress standards are appropriate for those on the platform, what the sancturary temperature is, and a host of other things essential to the running of a church. All of those things are equally arbitrary yet within the scope of his legitimate authority. If ministers don’t have arbitrary authority, then neither do parents, and you will have destroyed parental authority which in turn destroys the family unit. Ditto for the church.

        Second, the settling of controversies rests in those in authority, not the reverse:

        Deut. 17
        8 “If a matter arises which is too hard for you to judge, between degrees of guilt for bloodshed, between one judgment or another, or between one punishment or another, matters of controversy within your gates, then you shall arise and go up to the place which the Lord your God chooses. 9 And you shall come to the priests, the Levites, and to the judge there in those days, and inquire of them; they shall pronounce upon you the sentence of judgment. 10 You shall do according to the sentence which they pronounce upon you in that place which the Lord chooses. And you shall be careful to do according to all that they order you. 11 According to the sentence of the law in which they instruct you, according to the judgment which they tell you, you shall do; you shall not turn aside to the right hand or to the left from the sentence which they pronounce upon you. 12 Now the man who acts presumptuously and will not heed the priest who stands to minister there before the Lord your God, or the judge, that man shall die. So you shall put away the evil from Israel. 13 And all the people shall hear and fear, and no longer act presumptuously.

        Eze. 44
        23 “And they shall teach My people the difference between the holy and the unholy, and cause them to discern between the unclean and the clean. 24 In controversy they shall stand as judges, and judge it according to My judgments.

        Thus, far from being “unbiblical,” it is in perfect accord with biblical precepts for ministers to settle controversies within their jurisdiction. From general matters of judgment to distinctions between the holy and the profane, they have the authority to make a decision in accordance with their view of biblical principles, and the children of God are required to obey the conclusions they draw—just as children are required to obey the precepts of their parents. This has NOTHING to do with adding or detracting form the word of God.

        It is typical for those who disagree to play the Pharisee card. We’re supposed to be teaching for doctrines the commandments of men, but they fail to note what Christ said in addition to that:

        Mat. 23
        2 “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat, 3 so do and observe whatever they tell you, but not the works they do. For they preach, but do not practice. 4 They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear,[a] and lay them on people’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger.

        First, the Pharisees (not the Sadducees or the Essenes) were in the seat of authority, and because they were in that position, they had the authority to command observance of many things. Christ DID NOT say that the people were free to ignore them. Instead, they were required to obey with the proviso that they not practice the hypocrisy of the Pharisees. Second, Christ specifically condemned the Pharisees for certain rules which contradicted express biblical teaching (e.g. corban, no healing on the Sabbath, etc.). Since He was and is the greater authority, He had the authority to condemn their hypocrisy, their excesses, and their false teachings. And by extension, we have the legitimate right to follow Christ where a minister contradicts express biblical teaching (e.g. telling my wife to sleep with him because he’s in authority).

        Arguing that a minister is without arbitrary authority is woefully unbiblical.

        However, as parents can be abusive and “discourage” their children, ministers can also be guilty of the same. An abusive parent will alienate h/er children, and an abusive preacher will alienate or scatter the flock. Neither of these things are the will of God.


  6. I Believe in the oneness teaching but do not agree with all the other legalism in the UPCI. Do you know of any other church that teaches the oneness without all the other legalism?



    1. Hello James,

      The Pentecostal Assemblies of the World, which was a co-split in Early Oneness Pentecostalism is primarily a black church, but it espouses the Oneness Doctrine, Jesus Name Baptism and seeking the sign of Tongues but lacks the majority of the legalism and authoritative dominance found in the Apostolic/United Pentecostal Church.


      Hope that helps in your faith journey. Many blessings to you,



  7. All this cult stuff resonate with my experience in the New Testament Church. This church is even worst than the UPC.
    All their pastors practice celebacy. They stay together in a place call faith home. You have to be literally separated from your family and if you are married and you want to enter into the ministry, you have to consecrate the bed (no sex). You don’t own anything . You are totally dependent on the church for your welfare.
    My elders were living for me. I spent 11yrs of my life in total deception. But thank God for His Mercy. Forgiveness helps me to heal rapidly.
    I accepted I was a victim. I forgive and move on with my life. Anytime the ill treatment surface, I just whispered Lord I forgive.



  8. You write,

    When the UPCI started allowing wedding rings and television, the hard core fundamentalists broke away.

    The UPC has never officially prohibited wedding rings. Indeed, many if not most of their churches allow them. They have, however, prohibited television until quite recently. Perhaps your perception of the UPC was skewed by the church you attended.

    Your column contains very little scriptural reasoning. You simply didn’t like the environment you belonged to and are now rationalizing your break from the movement. Of course, everybody who jumps ship onto another has to marshal their reasons for doing so.

    My purpose here is not to debate the subject with you. I challenged you to discuss the Trinity under one of your columns and decided to check out your blog. I saw the “Leaving Pentecostalism” button and decided to read it. The only reason I’m commenting here is to correct your statement about the UPC.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s